HILLARY CLINTON WEARS NO MAKEUP – BRAIN STILL INTACT

Courtesy of smh.com.au

Courtesy of smh.com.au

This week on smh.com.au the Beauty Beat blog ran a post about Hillary Clinton on recent trip to Bangladesh went “au naturel” and asked the question “Are You Ever Too Old For Makeup?”

Hillary looks alright. It’s not like she’s dishevelled. I’m sure her brain is still functional.

Back in February 2009 I wrote a post titled “Last Week I Bumped into Jeanette Howard” pretty much talking about the fact the clothes don’t maketh the man…or woman.

It’s true.  I was in my local Myer store looking for canisters to fit our variety of teas and there she was.  Her mobile phone rang and it got my attention; I looked towards her.  I instantly recognized her; but still I had to be sure.

As for the wife of a former prime minister she wasn’t all that striking.  I don’t really know what I expected but she really just looked like my mum.  No fancy shoes, no fancy bag, no fancy dress and no fancy hair.  She just looked nice.

Perhaps I’ve overdosed on Michelle Obama’s lemongrass suit she wore for the Inauguration and the white full length dress with crystals she wore to the Inauguration Ball.  Perhaps my perception of reality has been skewed a little this past week.

Jeanette Howard, during her time as Mrs Prime Minister, was accused of staying out of the limelight and not being vocal at all.  She just seemed like the dutiful wife that hosted dinners for international leaders of countries and industry but didn’t dare talk policy.  That’s what she was accused of.  Whether it’s true or not, I don’t know.

I’m sure Jeanette Howard and Michelle Obama have brains in their heads and can hold intelligent conversations with their respective husbands about their work.  Mr M discusses his work with me.  And I have been influential on him I’m sure.  Could it be possible to credit the wives of leaders as being instrumental in a policy change?

Quite frankly I don’t care who Michelle Obama wears and the emphasis on it I think is a little ridiculous.  Don’t get me wrong; let the inauguration of a new president be a big deal.  Absolutely.  But wives of leaders are more than just a Stepford wives with nice dresses and cooking skills.

I’m not wearing any makeup today. Thankfully kids are forgiving. So readers, what do you think?

2 Comments

MOTHER’S DAY – LOVE MY MUM, BUT I WON’T MISS HER

Last week I attended Joanne Fedler’s launch of her new book The Reunion; the follow up to her successful Secret Mother’s Business. The Reunion addresses mothers identities as their children grow into teenagers and aren’t as dependent as they once were.

During her speech at the launch Joanne said that it’s not that only that we are of age that our children might not need us as much, but we are probably of age where our own mothers have either passed away or, let’s face it, we heading into those ‘well you’ve reached life expectancy, so every year is a bonus’ phases.

I don’t have teenage kids but my mother is 76 years old. I’m 38.  She is exactly twice my age.

Heavy Traffic Approaching Rookwood Cemetery

Heavy Traffic Approaching Rookwood Cemetery

Today when I was driving to my brother’s house for mother’s day lunch we passed Rookwood Cemetery. The line of traffic trying to enter the cemetery would put morning peak hour to shame.

“How sad”, I thought. It must be one of those horribly painful days when it feels like the rest of the world is celebrating; those people in the traffic jam were hurting.

How would I react if my mother passed away tomorrow? And to be honest I don’t know if I would be ‘absolutely devastated’ which is the common held viewpoint. I would be sad; but you see my mother isn’t my rock. She’s not someone I ever turned to. Ever.

It’s not that I don’t love my mother. And it’s not because I don’t respect her. Because I do love and respect her. And I am very aware of the sacrifices she made for me. She worried about me; she helped me; she supported me. But she never bonded with me; and that there is the broken link in the chain.

Hers was a different parenting style; from a different era. She grew up in a time when girls got married and had children. That was their lot in life. You didn’t marry for love; you married a good man who would look after you.

And you certainly didn’t have kids because you wanted to; you had kids because you were expected to.

Even though I was an ‘accident’ my mother did show me love. I do remember the lovely things she did for me growing up. But she never spoke about herself. Conversations were always of a practical nature. She didn’t tell me about the birds and the bees. She was relieved on the day when I first got my period that I didn’t need her to explain what was going on because my older sister had already clued me in.

My sister had to find out from her friends.

But our relationship also had a reactionary element to it. You see the man my mother married, didn’t turn out to be so nice.  So for many years my mother stressed and worried about what type of mood my father would be in and spent equal number of years protecting us from his temper.

She spent so long just trying to keep the peace that I think the option of sitting around relaxing of a cup of tea to have a conversation was well…not an option.

We didn’t spend much time together as a family; purely because my siblings and I tried to avoid our father.

So those years when we should have been talking were spent either in silence, doing chores or in separate rooms.

I was jealous of my friends who had fantastic relationships with their mum. Who could go crying to her because they had a fight with their boyfriend or they are having trouble with schoolwork or they are just having a bad day.

There was no room in my life for that. Wasn’t allowed to have a boyfriend; and perhaps I should study more and bad day? I’ll give you bad day….

My mother didn’t have time or room in her life for my problems. She had her own. But like I said at the top, she has done a lot. And I know that I put her in a difficult position plenty of times when she would try to mediate a fight between my father and I. And my father would always say in disgust “that’s your daughter”.

I had to learn to get on with my life without my mother as my rock.  I didn’t turn to her for help when I got married and even when I was pregnant I didn’t turn to her for advice. “Doctors know better”, she would say.

Soon after I got married my mother did say to me that if she got cancer she wouldn’t treat it because her time here on earth had served its purpose. Her reasoning was she raised 3 kids who were independent and no longer needed her. She didn’t need to worry about us anymore; we knew how to take care of ourselves without her.

Now because of her age, she can’t babysit or help out with anything physical but she will buy me extra pasta if she sees it on special or chocolate Monte biscuits because she knows I like them.

We don’t talk everyday; maybe once a week. And again, conversations are usually of a practical nature.  How are the kids going at school? Did Alex score a goal in soccer?

I know what you might say. That’s it not too late to begin a real relationship. I’ve tried. I even think she’s tried but it just seems all too awkward so we just fall into our usual patterns.

In a backward bizarre way at least I know that when my mother does die, I won’t be so brokenhearted that carrying on without her will seem unimaginable. Sounds nasty but in a way I feel like I’m going to be spared emotional turmoil.

I don’t know what’s worse? To be brokenhearted or apathetic?

13 Comments

DO CHILDREN BELONG IN ART GALLERIES?

My daughter looking at Sidney Nolan's Ned Kelly series

A couple of weeks ago Jacqueline Maley wrote a post on Daily Life Why Kids Should Be Banned From Art Galleries

Now I’m not about to attack Maley because in her follow up post she stated that she wrote that post in jest and I’m inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt.

But what Maley did do is tap into something that is a common held belief that children should not be allowed in the domain of adults.  Even though they are public places.

We’ve all heard complaints from travelers about children on flights or even my own post about visiting a local bistro.

For as vocal as the ‘children are a nuisance’ brigade is, there is an equally vocal group of people who insist children be treated as people too. You just need to read the comments in Maley blog post.

How did we get here? Are we are a bunch of individuals who don’t want children to encroach our lifestyle or are we a community voicing genuine concerns?

There’s seems to be a distancing of children, a putting them in a corner…over there…away from here sentiment. It’s not enough to choose to be childless but people want to be childless in every facet of their life. And if they have to endure children in public spaces then they are certainly going to have something to say about it. That sounds harsh doesn’t it? And it is. But is there an element of truth in it?

Let’s take Maley’s post on the National Art Gallery as a case study here.

Yes, the Gallery is certainly not a playground and parents need to be mindful of their children’s behaviour in public but children should not be banned from places like art galleries? Do children get bored? Yes. Will you wiz through it faster? Probably. But last time I checked, ‘time spent admiring’ wasn’t a prerequisite to enter a gallery.

And I disagree with Maley’s point that taking kids to the gallery is aspirational not educational.  I’m not entirely convinced that these two things are mutually exclusive. I don’t take my kids to galleries, museum, or theatre because I aspire them to become artists anymore than I take them to the movies to become a filmmaker or have them read books to become authors.

I do these things to provide exposure. Exposure is necessary.  It’s been accepted that, for example, active kids generally become active adults. Children who read books become adults that read books.

It’s all about habit forming. Why not art, theatre, charity work, history tours? This is the time when kids start to form opinions on art and culture; what resonates and what doesn’t.  This is the time to fill in the vacant slots as it were.

Maybe kids won’t appreciate a gallery as much as an adult but that doesn’t mean they don’t store that information in their brains to call on it later in life; like a planted seed.  I mean, half the English texts I read during my highschool years were largely useless to me at the time. My Uncle Chris gave me Plato’s The Republic to read when I was 16. That text went over my head.  But, it did plant a seed and now I have The Republic on my bookshelf and pick it up to read excerpts.

And yes you can expose kids to a range of things through books but you tell me, doesn’t the Sydney Harbour Bridge look so much better up close and personal? Doesn’t a song sound so much better when you see it performed live than listening to it on CD? Doesn’t seeing Sidney Nolan’s Ned Kelly series impact you more than seeing it in a book? Why would children be any different? Are they not as open to experience as adults?

My eldest son who is one of those kids who gets bored very quickly and will wiz through things but he stopped at the Ned Kelly series. He even asked if he could buy the postcard on our way out. I was genuinely surprised because I thought he wouldn’t be interested. But hey, I was wrong.

Now on our way out a kind gallery worker told us that upstairs there is a kids section where they could create their own art. And so we went. And my children created their own art. So if the curators of the National Art Gallery see the value of having kids visit, so should the rest of us.

 And here’s the thing. It doesn’t take just one visit to a gallery, or the theatre to a) appreciate what you are seeing and b) how to behave in certain social spaces.

With every visit children learn how to behave in public spaces. They understand the social rules of being quiet, not running; This is how we learnt to read social cues, it’s how they will learn.

You don’t just suddenly wake up one day and knowing all of society’s unspoken and unwritten rules.

Now I can’t speak for an entire generation but there does seem to be a widely held belief that children today are doing more ‘adult’ type activities than we ever did.  Restaurants, overseas travel, galleries, theatre, musicals.

Maybe that’s true. The question is, is it so bad?

I know I didn’t get any exposure to ‘high brow’ type culture because my parents weren’t ‘high brow’ type people. But they are Greek so they did bang on about philosophy and democracy a whole lot.  But I did have a desire as a kid to visit museums and study history.  And music, oh my goodness, I remember seeing Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat when I was in primary school. That rocked my world.

But that’s life isn’t it?  A coat of many colours?  A jumbled mess of experiences that as we get older start sorting out?

Related posts

Last Sunday I Made A Memory

Mother’s Love; Mother’s Guilt

12 Comments

WHY DON’T MOTHERS VISIT THE DOCTOR MORE OFTEN?

Kate Pickle this week on Twitter said

I have been to the Drs for myself for the first time in 6 years (not counting pregnancy related stuff)…

Do you visit the doctor often?

Do you visit the doctor often?

And this got me thinking to a a post I wrote on my other Mum’s Word blog titled “Why Don’t Mums Visit The Doctor More Often?” in May 2007. Here it is below.

Yesterday I visited my GP for the first time in months. Her practice is in the area I used to live in 3 years ago. Why haven’t I changed GP’s? Well simply because I don’t go that often so a 25 minute drive out to see her once every six months (if I’m lucky) doesn’t bother me too much.

But yesterday my list was long…ridiculously long; small little niggly things that just build up over time. I had to corner Mr M so I could go to see the doctor alone.

Why don’t I see the doctor more often? Well it is difficult to discuss medical matters with kids around. Why don’t I leave the kids with Mr M? Well he works hard and sometimes finding a couple of hours during the week can be difficult. Even yesterday Mr M almost cancelled at the 11th hour but instead worked his little fingers to the bone to make it home in time. He looked frazzled.

So off the doctor I went and discussed my various ailments. A couple of those ailments need to be referred to a specialist and another couple need follow up with my GP.

The thought alone of now having to make appointments with specialists is tiring. Getting a suitable time for the appointment is often difficult and the costs involved in seeing a specialist is a concern. But I can’t ignore my GP’s advice.

I’m not the only one who avoids or just doesn’t get the time to see a GP. Quite a few mums I know are guilty of this too.

Mother’s would move heaven and earth to get their sick child to a doctor…why don’t we have the same concern for ourselves?

8 Comments

NEWS THIS WEEK 17 APRIL 2012

I’m a date late with my news wrap. Actually 1 week and 1 day. (Took last week off).

Yesterday morning I woke to this news story

A two-year-old girl spent at least three days playing beside her mother’s body in a Wagga Wagga home before being found on Friday.

Doesn’t your heart just break? I don’t know what happened. Details are very sketchy but whatever the story is behind this headline, a child’s heart is breaking. And just the confusion this poor little girl would have felt is beyond comprehension.

And there is of course the “Life On the Line” article in the Sunday Life Magazine. This has been a talking point in the blogosphere. I would love to know what readers, who aren’t bloggers, make of this article.

Just before I published this post The Age took down the story. Very interesting. Hopefully to correct some facts that were incorrect and the put it back up. What I will say is this; if The Age is going to publish something then I hope they stand by it and put it back up.

When bloggers publish a post, they stand by it; for better for worse.

I read this week that having more children, well more than your average of 2, may help you to live longer. Hmmm interesting.

Now I’ve heard that women who have more babies can reduce the instances in which they will develop breast cancer, ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer.

I found it thoroughly amusing when the smh.com.au article said

More children was linked to increased deaths from heart disease but this was accompanied by a decrease in deaths from cancer and respiratory disease, the authors wrote in the journal Age and Ageing.

So basically it’s swings and roundabouts. Eventually something is going to be the death of you.

A video showing children as drug traffickers has sparked a fierce debate in Mexico, with some calling it a wake-up call while others described it as political manipulation or even child abuse.

Now anything that uses children to illustrate an adult problem usually gets my back up. But these are desperate times.

I sponsored a little girl from Mexico. When my 3rd child was born I went to Child Fund and said find me the most needy baby girl in the world and I will sponsor her. They came back to me with Yatana, a baby girl born in Mexico a few months earlier than my 3rd child.

She has the most gorgeous big brown eyes and the chubbiest cheeks. I want Yatana to grow up in a safe Mexico.

I can only assume, and hope, that this video will shock people into action.

4 Comments